Do you think conservatives generally favor a police state and will readily exchange personal freedom?
Posted on December 21st, 2011 by admin
for the rule by police / security state apparatus / dictatorial government?
Witness their response to the OWS pepper spraying. Most responses consists of "when the police say jump.. you ask how high".
if we were so eager for your police state we wouldn’t be warning people about your President and his cronies
December 22nd, 2011 at 4:41 am
if we were so eager for your police state we wouldn’t be warning people about your President and his cronies
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 4:58 am
We believe in the law and if that means a few hipsters have to be pepper sprayed to enforce the law then so be it
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 5:11 am
Obviously not.
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 5:37 am
Cons are totalitarian authoritarians by nature.
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 6:06 am
Yes, that is exactly what the TEA party protestors meant by limited government intrusion into our daily lives. (rolling eyes). I swear, you progressives really do lack common sense don’t you? Opposing lazy hippies squatting in public squares does not equate to supporting fascist tactics to be used by the police to remove them. And if you think what is going on right now in these cities to remove these protestors is equivalent to a “police state”, then you clearly need a history lesson. Hell, all you need to do is look at some Middle Eastern countries like Syria…now that is a police state.
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 6:51 am
actually liberals are always using police as an example of socialism working.
OCCUPY WALL STREET RAP SHEET
Murders: 2
Rapes: 10+
Thefts: 500+
Incidents of public masturbation: 3+
Indecent exposure to children: 5+
Arrests: 4,000+
Suicides: 1
Arson: 2+
Cost in damage: $10+ million
and Let’s not forget the liberal OWS rioters urinating/defecating in public, breaking store windows, blocking traffic and taunting the police.
Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2808548/posts
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 7:32 am
Id prefer it if we got out of other countries business. saved our money that were spending overseas (1 trillion and counting) and use that money at home where it’s needed. And no, personal freedoms are what we’re for. We don’t want govt interfering with our lives
References :
Conservative
December 22nd, 2011 at 8:15 am
A police state with, of course, exemptions for the highest level of society.
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 8:24 am
Don’t forget—– It’s the Conservatives that Feed You and Keep You From Starving.
Don’t bite the hand that feeds you.
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 9:11 am
The problem is that most cons believe in a social caste system, and they think that they’re in the same caste as the 1%. They’re too stupid to realize that they’re really just holding the piss bucket for the 1%.
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 9:28 am
Oh yes – the more freedoms that our diseased Baby Bush took away the more the "conservatives" clapped their little hands. They couldn’t throw their freedoms out the window quickly enough.
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 9:39 am
"when the police say jump.. you ask how high". – Even I was amazed at how many said things like that …
Many think if they lick enough boots of power, somehow they’ll be let into the club …
Funny because it’s their children that will inherit the lack of freedom the most …
They remind me of the types that cheered on McCarthyism
References :
December 22nd, 2011 at 10:18 am
And yet, using the tax code for "philanthropic" purposes, thus failing to recognize the difference in principle between Christian/Judeo "charity" and the principle of using the "power of the state" for the same purpose… is just fine with liberals.
"Charity" is a function of the Church but liberals are just fine with blurring the "separation of church and state" over that.
Which causes me confusion as I’m not sure whether or not we have a secular democratic "police state" or a religious socialist "police state" now.
References :