Freedom Ride

wt would happen if it went tho? will celebrities be free?

LMAO @ celebreties being free….

It would mean everything you heard and read was spoon fed to you by the government.

11 Responses

1. GoGo Girls Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 4:13 am

   Freedom would be gone and no celebrities would not be free either.
   References :

2. Michelle Obama Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 4:25 am

   Fascist libtards would rule the world.
   References :

3. Disco Stu Has a Hot Wife Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 4:47 am

   LMAO @ celebreties being free….

   It would mean everything you heard and read was spoon fed to you by the government.
   References :

4. Joshy Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 5:12 am

   f all will happen
   References :

5. Twisted_Ace Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 5:51 am

   If you want to see what happens when the freedom of the press is removed, just look at China, North Korea, Zimbabwe or Iran.

   A free society has a free press.
   References :

6. Gorkbark Porkduke Gefunken Fubar Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 6:15 am

   You would only know what the government wanted you to know.
   References :

7. Tony A Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 7:05 am

   Since when was there freedom of the press? The press are owned or controlled by the same banking oligarchy that control the money supply to all but a few countries around the world and by this means the governments. They print what they are told to print.
   References :

8. stabilis Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 7:19 am

   There would probably be a lot more truth about The gutter press don`t give a damn what lies they print about other people , or about their right to privacy But they are the first to scream about freedoms when their dubious methods are threatened I gave up buying newspapers because of their guttersnipe values
   References :

9. Mad Max Says:
   February 21st, 2010 at 7:47 am

   It already has gone in the UK. Anything the government don’t want printed they slap a D Notice on.
   References :

10. The Patriot Says:
    February 21st, 2010 at 8:14 am

    In the UK, we do not have freedom of the press. The recent case with John Terry showed that http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jan/31/john-terry-government-concern-super-injunctions and although that was overturned, that has not been the case in other areas.

    Tiger Woods has used the courts to ban publication of photographs that may or may not exist about him and other women. http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/dec/11/tiger-woods-law-injunction-media

    And another ban on reporting where the Guardian was banned from reporting on Trafigura was only lifted once the story was leaked on Twitter. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/13/guardian-gagged-parliamentary-question

    Let alone the dreaded D notice (or the DA notice as it is now called). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DA-Notice While the D notice has been quite rightly used for national security, it also has been used at times to silence the press in the UK. In general though, it tends not to be misused, though from what I know of some cases, this is not always the truth. For obvious reasons, I can not say more on where I think it has been misused!
    References :
    http://observer.guardian.co.uk/freepress/0,,478363,00.html
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/press-freedom

11. jeff. Says:
    February 21st, 2010 at 8:34 am

    Freedom of the press,,You mean these people who pay other people for the dirt on you, it would be a bloody better world paper tell lies,lies and even more lies.
    References :

Leave a Comment

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.