Do Republicans realize that one can be anti-state and still cling to leftist ideas like freedom and equality?

Posted on December 5th, 2010 by admin

Libertarianism was originally a leftist movement, with an anarcho-communist as the founder.

When will leftist realize Freedom and equality are right wing mainstays and the left is the party going after your individual rights. It was the left wing that wanted and continued slavery, it was the right wing that stomped it out. Lincoln was a republican, Eisenhower was a republican, Jackson was a slave holder and the founder of the democratic party

Police reform and how best to defend freedom by fighting the police state?

Posted on December 2nd, 2010 by admin

What is it going to take to get these psychotic violent and militarized monsters under control?

We live in a democracy.

Ultimately, the police answer to society as a whole. If you want to change the police, get involved in politics and get the local government to change the policies of the department.

What state has the most freedom for owning and using firearms.?

Posted on November 27th, 2010 by admin

I want to be able to fire guns in my backyard etc. without having neighbors calling the cops on me.
Yes my back yard and it wont be small. And i hate city-like areas i like quiet spacious areas. Almost like a large field like area or woodland area.

In your backyard? Hope it is a big one with the appropriate safeguards. I can shoot in my backyard. I am outside of city limits. But I do not because there are houses only 200 yards from my back fence.

to maintain freedom of religion church and state should be combined?

Posted on November 25th, 2010 by admin

i have a debate and i need help heres the prompt "Separation of church and state is essential to maintain freedom of religion" and i got the con side :/

the Church is the State

Filed under freedom state | 1 Comment »

Can a state be classed as a freedom of speech state but not tolerate racism or insighting violence?

Posted on October 29th, 2010 by admin

I’m using the UK as an example as I live here. The politicians talk about Britain being a free country, however, the state doesn’t tolerate racism. Is this contradictory?

This is slightly contradictory, but it still allows for most expressions of political and religious opinions.

The United States has more uh, free freedom of speech laws. Although inciting to violence is not allowed, because it encourages commitment of a crime, and threats or slander is not allowed either, insults are allowed. For example, the KKK is very racist, but as long as they do not commit any crimes they are tolerated.

If you’re going to restrict freedom of speech, such as banning racists speech, then it’s a careful line. On one hand, you are protecting a group of people, but on the other you are restricting freedoms. There is a small middle ground in which you need to be.

I prefer the American way of being more lax.

What does "While the state exists,There can be no freedom. When there is freedom, there will be no state" mean?

Posted on June 14th, 2010 by admin

I know the basic meaning but i don’t know the FULL and deep meaning :( Can someone please explain it to me really good, i have to write an essay on this on Macbeth. Can someone also give examples of how this quote is on Macbeth? Thanks!

It is a statement about anarchy, and it is wrong. It is only under a very limited "government by the consent of the governed" that we can have freedom–from the force imposed by people who are not otherwise stopped except by laws and by the force of a state.

Without such a limited government we have the "freedom" to be vigilantes seeking retribution because there is no state to seek justice for us. Whooops, I mean, we have NO freedom because we must spend our spare time protecting our families and our values and our valuables from predators and from the force they use against us. We would be back in a "state of nature" that nature never intended for Man. Nature gave Man a rational mind, and that is the reason that Patrick Henry, James Madison, and a few others would not sign the Constitution until the Ninth Amendment was added saying that we retained all the freedoms nature gave us, that just because the Constitution didn’t say we had this-or-that freedom, that we didn’t have it. We did, and the Ninth protects them. The Tenth gives us the right to use them.

What state formed a regiment for black soldiers in 1778 and guaranteed slaves who enlisted freedom?

Posted on June 9th, 2010 by admin


Massachusetts

What is freedom on an individual, social and state level ?

Posted on May 26th, 2010 by admin


there is no freedom you are constrained by gender…

Why Is A Dictator Of Failed State Lecturing Americans About Freedom?

Posted on May 23rd, 2010 by admin

Calderon is an illegitimate dictator who has presided over a failed state run by drug cartels and crime bosses. For him to lecture the United States on how to run a country is like Pol Pot wagging the finger at someone for human rights abuses.

Mexico is a total police state where its inhabitants and anyone who dares visit are subjected to some of the most draconian and brutal law enforcement measures on the planet

woderful point….it was really a mistake on obamas part to have him come here america is more pi**ed off then ever at this outrage…the audacity of this man he cant even control his country AT ALL!!! his people are fleeing his country by the millions because its so great and hes going to tell us how we should handle ours…..great mother of pearl

Isn’t Obama Care Cardiac Arrest; A Lethal Stealth Sneak Ambush on American and State Freedom?

Posted on March 28th, 2010 by admin

The major news networks report experts saying Obama bill will kill true health care, not insure everyone, not assure care even if there’s coverage and it’s an attack on individual and state rights.

Who will pay for it when businesses can’t afford higher taxes and millionaires move their income offshore?

Although not yet officially "Obama Care" until signed into law, the simple answer to your concerns is a definite "No, the health care and insurance reforms is not in any way a stealth sneak ambush on American and state freedom [sic]" (ReadTheBill.org).

Fear not, young grasshopper…the only "stealth sneak ambush on American and State Freedom" as you suggest is the cult-evangelical religious fanatics who seized control of the Republican party back during Reagan days (Goldberg, 2006) with the intention of staging a stealth overthrow of our democracy "from within" in order to implant or embed a pentecostal (extremist) theocracy. If you should choose to object to this government takeover by religious extremists (in violation of our Constitution), you might want to begin research on a Washington-based pseudo-christian cult, The Family (Sharlet, 2008), which hosts the annual National Prayer Breakfast—sounds innocent enough, right? Not. Check out their alteregos: The Foundation, Youth With A Mission, YWAM, The Foundation, and Christian Mafia (the latter being the name they give themselves among members. Modern members include right-wing Senators Inhofe (advocates DEATH PENALTY in Uganda for gays) and embattled Ensign, among other right-wing extremist political leaders, and Michael Farris’s (Goldberg, 2006) home-schooled-since-infancy "culture warriors" and his young adult "Generation Joshua" biblical literalists who are taught from birth that they are "god-ordained" to "take dominion over every single level of "the Beast" (our government) in order to overthrow this government and "take dominion over all nonbelievers" (anyone who does NOT accept literal interpretation of scripture as the law of the land). THIS is the stealth sneak attack about which you should be ranting—not the life-saving, economy-saving, consumer-protecting, deficit-reducing access-for-all-Americans health care and insurance reforms!

  • Categories

  • Pages

  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Meta

  •