What law takes away freedom of speech in school?

Posted on June 20th, 2010 by admin

I need help.
I am working on a paper and to bring everything together I need this one piece of information.

What law or rule gives the schools to act as the ‘parent’ when you are on the school grounds?

I mean, its no news that the school takes away freedom of speech(with good reason) so you can’t just go around cursing and making threats, but i want to know why?How?

What law?
If that makes sense.

Help Will be greatly appreciated.

freedom of speech doesnt really mean freedom of speech. you cant make threats anywhere, and you cant say anything that could incite violence. so cussing and threats are both technically illegal. but they should take into account how the word was used like if your cussing at someone then its bad but casually cussing shouldn’t be a problem.

Can freedom of speech exist in nations with strong governments?

Posted on April 30th, 2010 by admin

Throughout the world, countries with strong governments do not allow free speech. This is even true in European countries that forbid speech that criticizes government policies disguised in legislation called hate crimes and thought crimes. So can a nation with a strong government, allow freedom of speech or does it disappear because the strong government tries to be a nanny state and determine the rights it can provide and take away from its citizens?

Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. As such, our Founding Fathers chose to expressly limit the powers of the federal gov’t in the Constitution. That said, we’ve allowed our gov’t to grow to a point that the Constitution is completely ignored. The vast, vast majority of what Congress votes on every day is unconstitutional under various amendments.

When people allow the gov’t to grow too powerful, rights are trampled. Thus, when carried to the extreme, the answer to your Q is, "No."

What is the difference between sedition and patriotic freedom of speech?

Posted on April 23rd, 2010 by admin

is sedition "0bama regime" while patriotic freedom of speech is "Bush regime"?

Sedition is designed to incite rebellion against authority as in an act of civil unrest or violence. The people on the left are attempting to cause civil unrest by their rhetoric against citizens who do not agree with their policies. If their words stir some fringe group to an act of violence against government, they have used sedition to accomplish an act of rebellion. The very people who are guilty of sedition are accusing peaceful group demonstrations of using sedition. Their hope is to discredit any who would disagree with the greed, corruption and flawed agenda that the administration and Congress are engaging in. It is sort of like lighting a fire and then blaming others for the act of arson. The left has no morals or class, only an agenda at any cost.

Do activists for illegals want to restrict freedom of speech & start arresting people who violate their?

Posted on April 11th, 2010 by admin

Do activists for illegals want to restrict freedom of speech & start arresting people who violate their guidelines for what is acceptable speech and what is not ? Will they be pressuring Obama to start arresting people and jail them ?

Yes, isn’t it funny how they want to arrest us for speaking our minds and defending our country, but do not want the real criminal illegals arrested. Shows how low their tactics and morality is.

Why is freedom of speech important in canada?

Posted on February 22nd, 2010 by admin

We are doing a debate on this topic and we are FOR freedom of speech, any help?

Freedom of speech is important EVERYWHERE.

If the government controls your speech, you have no freedom. Once they take your freedom to say what you want, they will begin to control what you think.

What ever happened to freedom of speech here?

Posted on February 16th, 2010 by admin

It seems lately,you can never have a freedom of speech here and express your opinions,and then you get banned because of people who love to report others.I get everyone arguing with me about me being against abortion,spanking/hitting and not believing in a "god" why can we not live peacefully without judging a person by their belief’s?

Because most people on Y!A Are very ignorant ._.

Why is the UK Govt so intimidated by their muslim constituents that they suppress freedom of speech?

Posted on February 15th, 2010 by admin

The UK recently banned Wilders and Savage where will it stop? Is freedom of speech and the press dead in England?

It’s because Muslims basically have this country under the thumb. They can do what they like when they like. Islam is given special treatment because they cry and blow places up if they don’t get it.

1)It’s legal in Islam to wife beat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp3Eam5FX58

2)Islam dictates that a Muslim can rape his wife: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46yJ2Ho__QU

3)They can protest British troops trying to liberalise people in Afghan and Iraq: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAi-E8tE4ao but they can’t protest Islamic terrorism.

4)Islam allows kiddie fiddling: http://www.wikiislam.com/wiki/Pedophilia_in_the_Qur%27an

5)A “standard” sermon speaks to “peaceful” Muslims about hating the Jews and the West: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7_LfghKTrk

6)Killing NON-Muslims is legitimate in Islam: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWzbWInnGx0&feature=related

7)I was told by Muslims, that Muslims weren’t allowed to protest hence why they do not stand up against terror… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm5rpBa7WOw&feature=related Yet here they’re willing the likes of Bin Laden…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_zZGS1ZQuw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttz8-ucWhYc
[These two are a must watch if you have time]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm313U1Gu_Q&feature=related – Sharia law taking over uk

How do we reinstate the freedom of religion and the freedom of speech in the United States of America?

Posted on February 12th, 2010 by admin

Currently if you say the "wrong" thing you can get arrested for disorderly conduct. Disorderly conduct does not exist. Disorderly conduct was created to have a means to punish people who exercize their freedom of speech which is garanteed by the Constitution of the United States of America. If someone doesn’t like the freedom of speech they can get earplugs or move abroad. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. My name is Dionisios Mitropanopoulos and my phone number is 1-520-401-8866. My website is www.dodekatheon.info. Thank You.

True "freedom of speech" and complete religious freedom have never existed in USA. The Constitution was and is a tremendous document. If you slander someone , that can not be hidden behind the First Amendment.
If you’re a "Wiccan" you might still be arrested in some parts of the USA.
In reality the USA has moved away from it’s own Constitution and will never revert back.

How can someone get in trouble for saying something racist or offensive with freedom of speech?

Posted on February 7th, 2010 by admin

I mean doesn’t the Constitution give right to free speech? Just free speech? It doesn’t say "free speech unless someone gets upset" I mean isn’t a right? Doesn’t freedom come with a price? I mean I believe it is ignorant and no one should make distasteful jokes but isn’t it the right of the person weather they can tell the joke or not and not fear getting in trouble for it? If we start controlling and making people fear now what they say, what extremes can it be brought to in the future?

We also have The freedom of the press.
The freedom of assembly.
The freedom to bare arms.
Slowly we are losing the things our ForeFathers laid planned for us.
The nativity scene isn’t allowed to be displayed at the court house
anymore and that’s been several years ago.
How many more things can anyone think of what has been taken.
This practice has been going on for a long time.People just close their eyes.
It’s my business that I smoke.
I enjoy a well deserved cigarette while having my beer.
The freedom of assembly w/cigarette in hand is a no no.
So you see,slowly we are losing our rights.
Speeches are still allowed as long as you have a permit and without
disturbing the peace or what ever it is they say.
I’m tired.

What’s your opinion on freedom of speech, poetically speaking?

Posted on February 5th, 2010 by admin

If someone has freedom of speech to post a poem and ask for comments on it, is it double standards to seek to deprive someone else of expressing their opinion on it – either by blocking or reporting them. A public forum is either one thing or the other – it can’t be both. An excitable foreign youth, with delusions of adequacy, is currently trying to incite a riot – must be his diet. Hey, that almost rhymes. Comments and observations please.
Aragorn, I do not follow anyone’s poems around – I simply sometimes respond to various people whose names I recognize. As most, if not all of you, have contacts to whom you always respond, for you or anyone to accuse another person of following anyone around is ridiculous. On another response, you accused me of reporting all of Arwen’s poems. As you had no way of knowing who was responsible, such an accusation was thoroughly irresponsible. In effect, by stating as a fact something which was untrue, you lied. On that same response, you also called me a b*st*rd – now you are denying it. You are nothing but a liar through and through – and certainly no gentleman. As far as I’m concerned, her poetry is mince and I reserve the right to say so. If she can’t handle one negative comment amongst all the positive (’though deluded) ones she gets, then her ego needs reining in. Also, you are again lying – Arwen has commented several times on many things I have had to say.
Do you just make your statements up as you go along? On one of her responses to someone else’s questions, she said that poets have no need to wear masks because they simply write what is true – this from someone who wears the mask of "Princess Arwen" and conceals her true identity. You last comment is truly sickening – you speak of her as if she is some religious figure – instead of the pompous, deluded, mediocre writer that she is.

Cassie – I only count three women I call liars – which they are. Incidentally, I did not "infer" – the correct word you were looking for was "implied" – and I did not do that either. I came right out and called them liars – because they are. Incidentally, I would call a black man a black b*st*rd – if he was black and if he was a b*st*rd – to tell the truth is not to be a racist. I would also call a skinny b*st*rd a skinny b*st*rd, in the same way that I would call a fat one, a bald one, a hairy one, a greasy one, etc., exactly what they happen to be.
If a b*st*rd happens to be fat and I call him a fat b*st*rd, it does not mean I hate all fat people – same goes for if he’s skinny, lanky, speccy, greasy, ugly, hairy – or black. (Or white, yellow, red or any colour you care to mention.) I’m not into political correctness – it’s the same nonsense that says we shouldn’t send "Christmas" cards in case we offend Moslems – we should only send cards which bear the message "Season’s Greetings". We should call blackboards "chalkboards" in case we offend negroes, etc. All a complete pile of p*sh in my book.

Look at what’s getting everyone riled up here. Someone posts a poem, gets maybe a dozen responses saying things like "OMG – Amazing – You are a true poet – You are so talented", etc., etc. – then I pop up and say "It’s pants", and suddenly it’s the end of the world for that person and they’re never going to write again? Absolute b*ll*cks!
Anyone who would take offense at any of my comments (I’m not talking about the Iano impostors who are trying to stir up anti-Iano sentiment by putting words in my mouth) is not writing poems out of a love of poetry, but because they’re looking for meaningless flattery to feed their over-inflated egos and give them a sense of self-validation that they ill-deserve. The fact remains that most of the people who post poetry on Yahoo should not be encouraged – because they are absolute cr*p at it. Have you seen America’s Got Talent? Filled with people who labour under the delusion that they’re going to be "the next best thing" and then humilate themselves in front of millions of people. Why? Because their friends and loved ones didn’t have the b*lls to say "Give it up, Junior – you can’t sing/dance, juggle. etc., worth a d*mn. Either that, or they were similarly deluded about Junior’s abilities.
(Oops! Insert quotes after "d*mn" in the line above – I didn’t hit the key hard enough.)

Here’s the simple truth (again). People are posting poems on a PUBLIC FORUM and asking for opinions – I simply give them mine. The ones who get uppity about it are the ones on this page who email me with personal abuse, or call me names like "@sshole" or "b*st*rd", or publicly wish a horrible death upon me and try and start campaigns against me. Seriously, do you really believe those are the actions of rational, well-balanced, decent people? Just because I said I didn’t like their poem. Often one lone, negative response amongst others praising them to the rafters, but they focus on the one dissenting voice as an object of hate and villification. As far as I’m concerned, those people shouldn’t be allowed out by themselves.

People have to wade through mainly cr*p on Yahoo – if a humorous comment by me brings a smile to the lips of some weary traveller wading through a sea of sh*t, know what?
IT’S A JOB WELL DONE.

Freedom of speech comes with responsibility. I personally have never blocked or reported anyone. Everyone should be entitled to have their say. However, I do believe that when giving your point of view or critique, you should do so in a polite way. I don’t believe you should make people feel bad. Even if a poem is absolute crap, point them in the direction of how they can improve it, or just do not leave a comment at all. There is no need to crush peoples hopes. The person you mention above could end up by doing more harm than good even though his intentions are for a clean up job of the poetry site. My view for what it’s worth. Much more tolerance required here. May I add I don’t see the women poets causing trouble.

Edit: ( following the points you raised regarding my earlier answer).

I do not know what went on between Arwen and you. I have no knowledge whatsoever as I do not read everything on this site. All I know is that she said she left because of you and that came in the first instance, from a mutual colleague of ours.

The other point that I want to make is that on this page alone you have inferred that four women are liars.

I was educated and brought up in a background which offered encouragement and nurture to get the best out of people. I do not understand any other way. You have opposing views to mine. I also believe in telling the truth. You can tell someone their poetry isn’t any good without decimating them altogether and preventing them from even trying to improve. Also, poetry is subjective. I may feel something is actually quite pleasant and promising, when you feel it is crap. You do not appear to enjoy any free verse at all, preferring only rhyme and meter.

I am a mature woman in my 50’s with family. I know only too well how youngsters can react to put downs, it would be wrong to do this. (Note I have not accused you of it because I have not seen it with my own eyes). I was anxious when I first posted on this site and I don’t consider myself fragile. I was anxious about coming across the sort of put downs that you can give. If that had happened to me, I may not have bothered to have continued writing. I would not have known that I showed any promise (even you have acknowledged that)

Consideration of peoples feelings, cost nothing. I would by far prefer to be remembered as a person who encouraged someone to enjoy poetry than put them off it altogether.

As someone else mentioned further up, freedom of speech does not mean the freedom to abuse and create negativity. With it comes responsibility. That’s why you can’t call a black man a black b——–because it is a racist hateful remark and you would get pulled up for it. So when it boils down to it perhaps there is no such thing as complete freedom of speech because there are laws in place against racism, inciting racial hated etc.

We have very different views, but on this page thankfully are to express them.

  • Categories

  • Pages

  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Meta

  •