How can someone get in trouble for saying something racist or offensive with freedom of speech?

Posted on February 7th, 2010 by admin

I mean doesn’t the Constitution give right to free speech? Just free speech? It doesn’t say "free speech unless someone gets upset" I mean isn’t a right? Doesn’t freedom come with a price? I mean I believe it is ignorant and no one should make distasteful jokes but isn’t it the right of the person weather they can tell the joke or not and not fear getting in trouble for it? If we start controlling and making people fear now what they say, what extremes can it be brought to in the future?

We also have The freedom of the press.
The freedom of assembly.
The freedom to bare arms.
Slowly we are losing the things our ForeFathers laid planned for us.
The nativity scene isn’t allowed to be displayed at the court house
anymore and that’s been several years ago.
How many more things can anyone think of what has been taken.
This practice has been going on for a long time.People just close their eyes.
It’s my business that I smoke.
I enjoy a well deserved cigarette while having my beer.
The freedom of assembly w/cigarette in hand is a no no.
So you see,slowly we are losing our rights.
Speeches are still allowed as long as you have a permit and without
disturbing the peace or what ever it is they say.
I’m tired.

What’s your opinion on freedom of speech, poetically speaking?

Posted on February 5th, 2010 by admin

If someone has freedom of speech to post a poem and ask for comments on it, is it double standards to seek to deprive someone else of expressing their opinion on it – either by blocking or reporting them. A public forum is either one thing or the other – it can’t be both. An excitable foreign youth, with delusions of adequacy, is currently trying to incite a riot – must be his diet. Hey, that almost rhymes. Comments and observations please.
Aragorn, I do not follow anyone’s poems around – I simply sometimes respond to various people whose names I recognize. As most, if not all of you, have contacts to whom you always respond, for you or anyone to accuse another person of following anyone around is ridiculous. On another response, you accused me of reporting all of Arwen’s poems. As you had no way of knowing who was responsible, such an accusation was thoroughly irresponsible. In effect, by stating as a fact something which was untrue, you lied. On that same response, you also called me a b*st*rd – now you are denying it. You are nothing but a liar through and through – and certainly no gentleman. As far as I’m concerned, her poetry is mince and I reserve the right to say so. If she can’t handle one negative comment amongst all the positive (’though deluded) ones she gets, then her ego needs reining in. Also, you are again lying – Arwen has commented several times on many things I have had to say.
Do you just make your statements up as you go along? On one of her responses to someone else’s questions, she said that poets have no need to wear masks because they simply write what is true – this from someone who wears the mask of "Princess Arwen" and conceals her true identity. You last comment is truly sickening – you speak of her as if she is some religious figure – instead of the pompous, deluded, mediocre writer that she is.

Cassie – I only count three women I call liars – which they are. Incidentally, I did not "infer" – the correct word you were looking for was "implied" – and I did not do that either. I came right out and called them liars – because they are. Incidentally, I would call a black man a black b*st*rd – if he was black and if he was a b*st*rd – to tell the truth is not to be a racist. I would also call a skinny b*st*rd a skinny b*st*rd, in the same way that I would call a fat one, a bald one, a hairy one, a greasy one, etc., exactly what they happen to be.
If a b*st*rd happens to be fat and I call him a fat b*st*rd, it does not mean I hate all fat people – same goes for if he’s skinny, lanky, speccy, greasy, ugly, hairy – or black. (Or white, yellow, red or any colour you care to mention.) I’m not into political correctness – it’s the same nonsense that says we shouldn’t send "Christmas" cards in case we offend Moslems – we should only send cards which bear the message "Season’s Greetings". We should call blackboards "chalkboards" in case we offend negroes, etc. All a complete pile of p*sh in my book.

Look at what’s getting everyone riled up here. Someone posts a poem, gets maybe a dozen responses saying things like "OMG – Amazing – You are a true poet – You are so talented", etc., etc. – then I pop up and say "It’s pants", and suddenly it’s the end of the world for that person and they’re never going to write again? Absolute b*ll*cks!
Anyone who would take offense at any of my comments (I’m not talking about the Iano impostors who are trying to stir up anti-Iano sentiment by putting words in my mouth) is not writing poems out of a love of poetry, but because they’re looking for meaningless flattery to feed their over-inflated egos and give them a sense of self-validation that they ill-deserve. The fact remains that most of the people who post poetry on Yahoo should not be encouraged – because they are absolute cr*p at it. Have you seen America’s Got Talent? Filled with people who labour under the delusion that they’re going to be "the next best thing" and then humilate themselves in front of millions of people. Why? Because their friends and loved ones didn’t have the b*lls to say "Give it up, Junior – you can’t sing/dance, juggle. etc., worth a d*mn. Either that, or they were similarly deluded about Junior’s abilities.
(Oops! Insert quotes after "d*mn" in the line above – I didn’t hit the key hard enough.)

Here’s the simple truth (again). People are posting poems on a PUBLIC FORUM and asking for opinions – I simply give them mine. The ones who get uppity about it are the ones on this page who email me with personal abuse, or call me names like "@sshole" or "b*st*rd", or publicly wish a horrible death upon me and try and start campaigns against me. Seriously, do you really believe those are the actions of rational, well-balanced, decent people? Just because I said I didn’t like their poem. Often one lone, negative response amongst others praising them to the rafters, but they focus on the one dissenting voice as an object of hate and villification. As far as I’m concerned, those people shouldn’t be allowed out by themselves.

People have to wade through mainly cr*p on Yahoo – if a humorous comment by me brings a smile to the lips of some weary traveller wading through a sea of sh*t, know what?
IT’S A JOB WELL DONE.

Freedom of speech comes with responsibility. I personally have never blocked or reported anyone. Everyone should be entitled to have their say. However, I do believe that when giving your point of view or critique, you should do so in a polite way. I don’t believe you should make people feel bad. Even if a poem is absolute crap, point them in the direction of how they can improve it, or just do not leave a comment at all. There is no need to crush peoples hopes. The person you mention above could end up by doing more harm than good even though his intentions are for a clean up job of the poetry site. My view for what it’s worth. Much more tolerance required here. May I add I don’t see the women poets causing trouble.

Edit: ( following the points you raised regarding my earlier answer).

I do not know what went on between Arwen and you. I have no knowledge whatsoever as I do not read everything on this site. All I know is that she said she left because of you and that came in the first instance, from a mutual colleague of ours.

The other point that I want to make is that on this page alone you have inferred that four women are liars.

I was educated and brought up in a background which offered encouragement and nurture to get the best out of people. I do not understand any other way. You have opposing views to mine. I also believe in telling the truth. You can tell someone their poetry isn’t any good without decimating them altogether and preventing them from even trying to improve. Also, poetry is subjective. I may feel something is actually quite pleasant and promising, when you feel it is crap. You do not appear to enjoy any free verse at all, preferring only rhyme and meter.

I am a mature woman in my 50’s with family. I know only too well how youngsters can react to put downs, it would be wrong to do this. (Note I have not accused you of it because I have not seen it with my own eyes). I was anxious when I first posted on this site and I don’t consider myself fragile. I was anxious about coming across the sort of put downs that you can give. If that had happened to me, I may not have bothered to have continued writing. I would not have known that I showed any promise (even you have acknowledged that)

Consideration of peoples feelings, cost nothing. I would by far prefer to be remembered as a person who encouraged someone to enjoy poetry than put them off it altogether.

As someone else mentioned further up, freedom of speech does not mean the freedom to abuse and create negativity. With it comes responsibility. That’s why you can’t call a black man a black b——–because it is a racist hateful remark and you would get pulled up for it. So when it boils down to it perhaps there is no such thing as complete freedom of speech because there are laws in place against racism, inciting racial hated etc.

We have very different views, but on this page thankfully are to express them.

Does anyone have Documentation to show that students should not have freedom of speech in school?

Posted on January 31st, 2010 by admin

High school senior has to do a speech on why kids in school should not have freedom of speech and it has to be documented, no opinions. They already did the pro on the subject, why kids should have freedom of speech in school.

Actually there is already a doucment that totally limits freedom of speech…at school i mean

Freedom of speech: when and how did it start?

Posted on January 29th, 2010 by admin

I’m writing a research paper for college assignment; I have some questions about freedom of speech and need some information about it :)

When did it begin? Did it first started since ancient Athens?
Who is the famous personage of freedom of speech during the classic period?
Any suggestion/recommendation in writing a research paper?

Thank you so much!

You can only speak freely when there is no fear of reprisal. Honestly everyone watches what they say even to there own family because maybe they depend on them. So what really is free speech? As far as laws are concerned I feel almost certain we are the first nation (US) to actually pass a law that specifically outlines your freedom of expression. I really do not think there is another out there, and we may not last much longer since the notorious communists within our country want to impose the "Fairness Doctrine" which will launch fines and possibly imprison current Conservative Radio talk show hosts if they fail to adhere to socialist reform and government regulations. As Reagan said in his inaugural address, we are the "last great" fortress of freedom. And we are under siege…

Do you think freedom of speech/expression should have more limits?

Posted on January 27th, 2010 by admin

I love America and I wish to serve it when I am older. But don’t you think that America should limit some of it’s freedoms? Like for instance freedom of speech/expression. Because of it, we have KKK members sending bad messages to people saying that one race is inferior or should be treated badly. I do value freedom but there should be some limits on certain freedoms, don’t you think?

No I do not agree. The only way to retain your freedom to say what you want is to protect the rights of those whose speech makes your blood boil. The proper response to offensive speech is not to suppress it but to speak out about it. More speech, not less, is the answer.

Do we really have freedom of speech when we can get fired for sending a racist email?

Posted on January 25th, 2010 by admin

This country was built on freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Whether its right or wrong a person should not be fired or suspended for making a racist remark.

You shouldn’t really have sent it

But they have the right to suspend you, because it was racist

Ive noticed how racism works both ways, yet only one way is punished, If a black/coloured/etc.. made a racist remark to someone who was white, then nothing would really happen, however, if it happened the other way, then it would be taken seriously,

Countries are so worried about being seen as racist that they will bend over backwards for people of other nationalities for fear of gaining a racist label

However, Racist or not, its considered abuse and bullying, in any respectable company, they will not tolerate it, so they had the right to punish you,

Your lucky that you haven’t lost your job all together, i know people who’ve been fired for smaller things than what happened with you

Try not to do it again-otherwise id be expecting to lose my job if i were you, once is a mistake, you were caught, its now in the past, doing it again is just plain idiocy

All the best xxx

What does Freedom of Speech really mean?

Posted on January 22nd, 2010 by admin

"I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

I do not recall who made this quote. I know it was part of a conversation between two British politicans durintg eighteenth century.

But this quote represents to me the true meaning of the Freedom of speech.

Would you defend everyone’s elses right to voice his opinion, no matter how much you disagree with it?

Slander is just someone’s opinion, and that is illegal. Reputations and futures are built on what people say. If it harms someone, should speech be completely free? I am on your side. My freedom and yours to speak our opinion is what makes this country great, but I believe there should be limits, however, in giving someone power to impose limits, where do you stop him from going too far. For example: Slander, exactly how do you draw the line between what is harmful to someone and what is not. That line continuously gets redrawn every day. Tabloid papers test the limits of the statute every day. Calling someone a thief is slanderous unless it’s true, and stealing words is commonplace, so everyone is at one time or other a thief. Obama and his wife are finding out the hard way what people are allowed to say just outside the boundaries of slander. Ross Perot gave up on trying not to be misquoted. Teachers have lost their professions because a student lied about an affair with them, and even when the truth came out, people still suspected the teacher, and his reputation is ruined. I wouldn’t live in a country without freedom of speech, but with that freedom should come the responsibility for what you say.

Since we have freedom speech, why are anti-non white comments immediately removed here?

Posted on January 20th, 2010 by admin

I asked why non-white racists questions are allowed, and some of them answered that we have freedom speech.

O.k I get your point, but why do you feel the need to constantly report questions and answers about the non-white communities’ problem?, I remember when I got reported because of "chat" then I reply the report and they thought I was right and that I was reported with no reasons.

Yahoo! is a politically correct, left-leaning garbage dump. So naturally, they will bend over backwards in order to not offend their "protected demographics." (aka, anyone not white, male, and straight) I too have noticed that anti-white bias shown on this site from the contributors, and the administrators as well.

The minorities just report stuff they don’t like to hear, regardless of whether it is the truth or not, an example being blacks getting questions deleted when they are in regards to the crime rate, illegitimacy rate, etc, etc, even when the statistics presented are factual and not racist in any way.

I dunno. Maybe they think if the question gets deleted, the problem doesn’t exist??? But whatever, ya know.

I feel it’s pathetic on both yahoo’s end, and pathetic by people that run around reporting things just because they don’t like to hear them, with no regard to the fact that people may have serious questions they want answered.

Why do religious people jump up and down about their freedom of speech?

Posted on January 17th, 2010 by admin

I recently posted a question about the appropriateness of religious types offering the Bible as practical advise for people esp the young with mental health issues. And all the religious types jumped up and down about their freedom of speech. I respect freedom of speech. But these people couldn’t see the issue of whether or not they’re response by using the Bible was appropriate. Yes you have the right to freedom of speech. But what about all the people whose rights you don’t respect. Gay and lesbian rights for example. Do they have freedom of speech too?????

If they didn’t try to censure everyone who disagreed with them, their freedom of speech would seem less like bullying.

Do you think freedom of speech will exist after Obama is in office?

Posted on January 13th, 2010 by admin

Democrats want to shut down talk radio and any other news outlet not spewing the Democrat party or liberal party lines. How? With the "Fairness Doctrine" passed as law, all talk radio and other outlets not giving the state sponsored answers will be obliged to give equal time and money to those who do. Freedom of speech will no longer be profitable in the media. Dissenting speech may no longer be seen through any normal media channels.

What are your thought on the fairness doctrine and the effect of it on our political the religious landscapes?

I think it is a desperate, pathetic move on behalf of the left. They obviously know that their talking points cannot survive on radio, as was proven with the failure of several liberal radio shows.

Since they cannot sustain radio on their own, they want to move into the successful right radio field. I would assume it is because they want to convert everyone.

Too bad they don’t know that by forcing liberal talk radio on us, we’ll just turn it off or tune to another station.

They’re jealous that the right actually has a very successful, influential medium, more powerful than their ABC, NBC and CBS combined.

  • Categories

  • Pages

  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Meta

  •