Freedom Ride

Explore historical background on First Amendment freedom of speech rights with particular focus on freedom of expression in a public school setting and the Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines.
# Analyze the relevant primary-source documents and identify arguments with varying points of view.
# Evaluate the arguments for and against freedom of speech and expression in school.

Here you go.

and all the other hypocritical slogans the kuffar use. Brothers and sisters need to realise whats going on. They are banning something FROM Islaam openly and directly against muslims, as opposed to secretly ! This is not a small thing.
@ muslim journalist,

"the same treatment America gave the Japanese Americans on the West Coast "

Or the native americans / red indians ? How sad some muslims don’t realise… <sad face

I am afraid that in 5-8 years from now the new President of America will issue an all out war on American born and American converts to Islam. It wouldn’t surprise me if one day soon, Muslim Americans at least are given the same treatment America gave the Japanese Americans on the West Coast during WW2 or did to the German Americans and Italian Americans during WW1. Muslims are becoming the underdog, and people do not realize when the world is done with the Muslims, if ever, then they be the next people to get their freedoms taken away.

In todays world it is now 2010, why does Armerca, not allow gay marrige except like in Conneticut, and Masachoosits, and liberal places. I mean, I am for gay and lesbian marrige. Why does not country agree to these views, as it is a right Amercans have and civil rights and eqcuality. It is civil rights issue, so why is not legal? Plese explane, thank you.

Most of America does support equal rights. Unfortunately we have people like McCain and Bush who stand in opposition to the Constitution and say that America is a Christian nation (also not true) and continue to fight gay rights. Eventually and very soon we will have gay rights everywhere.

-Billy

why do the goverment want to limit the freedom and rights of others? also do you think it is human nature or is it the environment they live in?

Is the government in some way preventing you from getting a proper education?
Honestly, reading your question hurt my head based on it’s structure alone.

What causes people to want to limit the rights and freedom of others? Is this just human nature, or the result of the environment they live in?

Im doing a lil project for school and I need to know where to find the infomation for this.

Your answer is Progressives who infiltrate the Democratic and Republican party they want this so they can transform America into a socialist nightmare after they erode our constitution. Read all about them it will make your head swim, be sure you do not read a book written by Progressives, they have a way to in- doctrine you by injecting you with their ideology. Good Luck with your project. I think you will get a good grade if you dig into the Progressives, it is a real eye opener.

Were Americans ever intolerant of different religions before the bill of rights legally allowed freedom of religion?

not in some places. Rhode Island was founded by a group who found the Puritans too unaccepting for example. Up to the Revolutionary war most churches were Anglican. In the northern states their were some Presbyterian and Methodist groups scattered about. Before the revolution preachers were supposed to get a license from the throne to preach. Churches in the didn’t worry too much about this, as very few non-Anglican priests were given licenses anyway. In the south the Anglican church fought the encroachment of their religious monopoly by sending militia or even mobs to arrest, beat or even kill non licensed priests. The Methodist and Presbyterian leaders in the South were looked at as a huge threat because they drew large crowds from the poor and even from slaves who embraced the idea that you could get to heaven through a personal relationship with God and not have to go through the Anglican institution which was more for the land owners anyway.

I am looking for Canadian articles related to breaking the charter of rights and freedom and also can be related to the holocaust. I’ve look through many sites but struggled. I couldn’t find anything. It should be recent but it can be like in 2001 as longs as it is not 2 years after the holocaust ended.

Since the Charter if Rights and Freedoms dates to 1982, and the Holocaust ended in 1945, I think any articles you find will be fine.

The Charter obviously never applied to the Holocaust, I presume what you’re seeking is references to people like Ernst Zundl, a well know Holocaust denier and Zionist conspiracy advocate who fought his charges of inciting hatred by use of the Charter right to freedom of expression. You can also try searching for Doug Christie, his lawyer and that of several of other anti-semites.

It seems that anti feminists are upset that there are people who don’t like or respect them.

And they are concerned that maybe it’s because "society" has dictated that they are "politically incorrect".

Let’s examine this. Feminism is about women having equal rights and freedoms as members of society. (In other words, we are full human beings.)

Anti-feminists attack this.

So, logically, what does this tell us about the anti-feminist movement?

Man-tax is a womans right and freedom?

Nuff said.

Is this ilegal?
By the way there are no misspelling errors here.

The Internet is public communication, so I say it is a violation of our 1st amendment and freedom of speech. There just hasn’t been enough people to exercise their right to petition yet. When that happens, yahoo will drop the board, just like they did the one to discuss the news.

Our constitution gives us the rights to bear arms. Clearly nuclear weapons, which are technically arms, shouldn’t be legal for any person to own. And most would agree a grenade launcher should also be banned.

Where do you think the line should be drawn and why?
Sway, are you saying that all weapons should be legal because most people can’t afford them?

The Right to Bear Arms – is the right to defend yourself. Some people can buy guns, as long as they are registered. They should be used to protect yourself in your home. You can’t go around with your gun, in case something happens, but you can have it a home, in case of an intruder. You have the right to protect yourself and your family, but you can’t go around with your weapon looking for a fight.