need it to start a speech about lack of awareness about the freedom struggle amoung the youth….indian context
Are you asking about Asian Indians or American Indians?
How should the government limit or not limit freedom of speech and why???
It depends on how you define the freedom of speech. Most define it as speech between the people and the government. Rather than thinking of putting limits on the freedom of speech, you should think of what is not protected by the freedom of speech. Some examples are threatening to harm or kill someone, ordering others to harm someone or damage property, shouting obscenities, slanderous speech etc.
The only difference between Offline and Online is that Online you can play with your friends or other people and it doesn’t matter if you do it on offline or online since the quests you finished are same. All you have to do is beat certain missons on every rank. I can’t tell you what mission since you diidn’t put the rank you are on so if you can, contact me and I’ll tell you the missions you have to beat for that rank to get hunter rank up.
should the press have the right to say whatever they want? or should they have every word they say censured?
It is important that the press be free of censorship. However there should be responsibility attached.
In the United Kingdom, if any branch of the media makes an error or deliberately tells an untruth they are obliged by law to correct the error in an equally or more prominent way. Except the newspapers.
For some reason the papers are exempt. If The Daily Mail or News of the World (for arguments sake, we all know how seriously those two take the truth) decide to trash your reputation falsely, it is up to you to complain to the Press Complaints Commission which is run by the newspapers. If they decide their chums are in the right you can then go to court at your own expense. If you can’t afford it that’s too bad.
This is clearly wrong, and goes a long way to explaining why journalists have such a bad image.
There should also be some discernment as to what is "in the public’s interest" as it is not the same thing as "what the public is interested in". Sections of the public may well be interested in what Max Mosely gets up to in his private life but so long as he is not breaking the law, harming anyone, or being hypocritical then it is none of the public’s business, however odious others may find him.
The press shouldn’t have the freedom to say whatever they want, nor should every word be censured. They should be able to report issues of concern to the public and to express opinion clearly stated as such free from political or financial influence. When they get it wrong they should be obliged to put it right.
This is not China or Cuba or the middle east. This is the land of the free. The land where one can say "I love my God". Can they destroy a man in the USA for loving God?
Would you be saying the same thing if he’d been wearing a "I love Satan" badge?
He wasn’t fired for "loving God"–he was fired for defying the dress code and then being a jerk about it.
I love America and I wish to serve it when I am older. But don’t you think that America should limit some of it’s freedoms? Like for instance freedom of speech/expression. Because of it, we have KKK members sending bad messages to people saying that one race is inferior or should be treated badly. I do value freedom but there should be some limits on certain freedoms, don’t you think?
No I do not agree. The only way to retain your freedom to say what you want is to protect the rights of those whose speech makes your blood boil. The proper response to offensive speech is not to suppress it but to speak out about it. More speech, not less, is the answer.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—
from the colonial period through Reconstruction, both in terms of expansion and contraction of freedom.
Thank you!
It is the one taking place right now. It’s the change from the free nation to a dictatorship / communist nation. This is the one YOU have to look out for Because it’s yours in just a few years. The USA is becoming part of a world nation. To be dictated by one governing body.
I wont be here Think GOD I don’t want to see it. when that takes place but YOU WILL.
I’m sorry for your future. I feel sad for all the great man and weman that died the protect it. But in the end failed.
Just think of me falling into deep space drifting ever further. like an astronaut with no way back.
That’s what I feel about what you will be faced with.
You will never know just what true freedom is. It will be just a dream to you.
The people I’m talking about are the ones who think that war is a good thing, that The War on Terror is just, that President Bush is great, etc.
I mean, really. They talk about freedom as if they know what it even means. If they didn’t have any normal neighbours or classmates or workmates, they’d be living in such a boring world.
It’s like they don’t recognize that it takes more guts to be non-violent than it does to go to Iraq and blow things up.
What get me is the female neo-con, Ann Coulter wanna bees who would never be drafted if the policies of Bush involves us in a bigger conflict…do they have male children about 12-18 years old? they wouldn’t have to serve in combat. no and no….I have a boy 16 and cringe at the fact that he might die in an eastern desert…i grew up thinking i was going to die in Vietnam and then graduated just as the war ended….i don’t mind a Conservative viewpoint, what drives me nuts is an ignorant, view that won’t listen to people with a real interest in the cost.
Wow, I get "thumbs down" because i want my son to live…excuuuuuse me
There is no question — they are a political group. If they are trying to lie about the essential nature of their organization, then they have no credibility on anything, especially the war.